There's contention surrounding the application of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to wild horse and burro management. Here's a breakdown of the two viewpoints:
Why some argue NEPA is being ignored:
Lengthy process: Completing Environmental Assessments (EAs) and Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) can be time-consuming, leading some to view it as a hurdle to progress.
Focus on streamlining: Efforts to expedite the NEPA process have raised concerns that thorough environmental reviews are being sacrificed for speed.
Advocacy groups' concerns: Some wild horse advocacy groups argue that NEPA isn't being given due weight in management decisions.
How NEPA data can be better used by BLM:
Informed Decisions: Robust NEPA analysis provides BLM with a clearer picture of potential impacts of various management options on the ecosystem, horses, and local communities.
Considering alternatives: A thorough NEPA process should explore a range of management options, including fertility control and adoption programs alongside removals.
Transparency and Public Input: NEPA mandates public comment periods, allowing stakeholders to voice concerns and offer solutions. This can help BLM craft plans with broader public support.
By ensuring comprehensive NEPA reviews, BLM can make data-driven decisions that consider ecological health, herd population, and the interests of various stakeholders.