Welfare Ranchers

The Taylor Grazing Act (TGA) of 1934 and its administration by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) have indeed been criticized for creating advantages for some ranchers. 

• Below Market Grazing Fees: The BLM sets grazing fees that are considerably lower than what ranchers would pay on private land. This can be seen as a government subsidy.

• Preferential Allocation of Forage: The TGA established a permit system for grazing on public lands. Ranchers with established use history often receive priority when permits are renewed or allocations adjusted. This can create a situation where newer ranchers or those with less history struggle to access public grazing lands.

Combined effect: These factors can lead to a situation where a limited number of ranchers benefit significantly from low-cost access to federal grazing lands. This can be perceived as an advantage over competitors who rely on private land or face higher costs to access public lands.

It's important to note there are counter-arguments:

• Stability and Conservation: Proponents of the current system argue it fosters stability for ranchers who are ingrained in the local communities and ecosystems. They  may have knowledge and practices that benefit the long-term health of the rangelands.

• Open Process: The BLM maintains that the permit system is fair and open to new applicants. They also highlight efforts to manage grazing for ecological health alongside economic benefits.

Here are some resources for further reading:

• Bureau of Land Management: About Livestock Grazing https://www.blm.gov/programs/natural-resources/rangelands-and-grazing/livestock-grazing

• Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (PRIA) [This act aimed to address some of the concerns about the TGA]