Wildfire Control Solutions

The idea of using reintroduced equines for wildfire prevention on BLM lands is an interesting one. Here's a breakdown of the potential benefits and drawbacks:

• Many BLM Managed Lands are Now Devoid of Equines

Since 1970 the BLM has removed all equines from many of the lands originally designated as reserved for wild horses and burros. Wildfire control in these areas has been made more difficult.  The BLM’s own data shows that livestock, not wild horses, are responsible for the vast majority of overgrazing on public lands.  Overgrazing is a primary cause of the invasion of species which are more prone  to support wildfire.  Wild horses are only found on 12 percent of BLM managed public lands.

• Grazing Management: Equines, like horses and burros, can be effective grazers. They consume a variety of grasses and vegetation, including some invasive species that contribute to high fuel loads.  The range of plants paletable to equines exceeds those of commercial livestock (cattle or sheep). This natural grazing could help reduce fire risk by creating fuel breaks and maintaining a healthier landscape.

• Habitat Restoration: Equine movement patterns can help disperse seeds and aerate soil, promoting plant diversity and a more fire-resistant ecosystem.   The equine digestive system is unique compared to cattle in this manner. Cattle do not dispurse seeds in their excrement producing a net negative impact on the range environmental health.

While rewilding equines has potential for wildfire prevention,  it  needs thorough  research and planning. The BLM would  need to  consider  carrying capacity, potential ecological impacts,  and public perception before implementing such a program.

Here are some additional points to consider:

• Species Selection: Different equine species have different grazing habits. Choosing the right type of equine for the specific ecosystem would be important.

• Training and Monitoring: Perhaps some training could be explored to encourage the equines to graze in high-risk fire areas. Additionally, close monitoring of herd health and movement would be necessary.

• Phased Approach: A pilot program on a smaller scale could be a good way to test the feasibility and effectiveness of rewilding for wildfire prevention.

< link> to established scientific rewilding for wildfire control is ongoing in California